Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/1477
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.advisorMedrano Galarza, Catalina-
dc.contributor.advisorBonilla Correal, Sebastián-
dc.creatorMontoya Torres, David Ernesto-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T19:01:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-10T19:01:26Z-
dc.date.created2020-11-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/1477-
dc.descriptionPropiaes_ES
dc.description.abstractThe science of animal welfare holds extensive research in the spheres of physical health and behavioral expression (naturalness), but regarding the mental sphere there is greater complexity and fewer studies, despite being one of the three fundamental pillars of animal welfare. The cat became the favorite pet in much of the world. However, there is a lack of research of this species, and understanding the feline mind is essential to provide adequate welfare conditions. In addition, there is a bidirectional relationship between cognition and welfare and this is a species that requires enriched environments in a more complex and stimulating way. The purpose of this review was to describe the different investigations that have tried to understand the mind of the domestic cat Felis silvestris catus. Cognitive research conducted on cats includes perception, object permanence, memory, physical causality, quantity and time discrimination, sensitivity of cats to human signals, vocal recognition and communication, attachment bonds, personality, and cognitive health; demonstrating in all cases the ability of the cat in these areas. Studies in cognition have demonstrated the ability of the cat to learn, do quickly and modify his behavior after learning, which also allows us to assume some degree of consciousness. The sentience of the cat is demonstrated by his ability to experience negative (fear and pain) and positive (joy, "friendship") emotions. The cat's mind is unique and it is extremely important to use some methods and interpret results in the context of the species. We can conclude that scientific research to date shows the capacities of sentience and cognition of the domestic cat, and opens the window for further research on the feline mind and its repercussions on maximizing its level of welfare and granting the protection they deserve.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipOtroes_ES
dc.description.tableofcontentsLa ciencia del bienestar animal posee amplia investigación en las esferas de la salud física y expresión comportamental (naturalidad), pero en lo que respecta a la esfera mental existe una mayor complejidad y menos estudios a pesar de ser uno de los tres pilares fundamentales del bienestar animal. El gato se convirtió en la mascota preferida en gran parte del mundo; sin embargo, se desconoce aún mucho de la especie y entender la mente felina es fundamental para proporcionarle las condiciones de bienestar adecuadas, ya que existe una relación bidireccional entre cognición y bienestar y esta es una especie que requiere ambientes enriquecidos de forma compleja y estimulante. El objetivo de esta revisión fue describir las diferentes investigaciones que a la fecha han buscado entender la mente del gato doméstico Felis silvestris catus. La investigación cognitiva realizada en gatos incluye percepción, permanencia de objetos, memoria, causalidad física, cantidad y discriminación de tiempo, sensibilidad de los gatos a las señales humanas, reconocimiento vocal y comunicación, vínculos de apego, personalidad, y salud cognitiva; demostrándose en todos los casos la habilidad del gato en estas áreas. Los estudios en cognición demuestran la capacidad del gato para aprender, hacerlo rápido y modificar su conducta tras este aprendizaje, lo que nos permite además suponer algún grado de consciencia. Se demuestra la sintiencia del gato por su capacidad de experimentar emociones negativas (miedo y dolor) y positivas (alegría, “amistad”). La mente del gato es única y es extremadamente importante usar metodologías de estudio e interpretar resultados dentro del contexto de la especie. Podemos concluir que las investigaciones científicas a la fecha evidencian las capacidades de sintiencia y cognición del gato doméstico, y abren la ventana para que se continúe investigando sobre la mente felina y sus repercusiones en la maximización de su nivel de bienestar y en la garantía de la protección que merecees_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad Antonio Nariñoes_ES
dc.subjectFelinoes_ES
dc.subjectmentees_ES
dc.subjectbienestares_ES
dc.subjectcogniciónes_ES
dc.subjectsintienciaes_ES
dc.titleMonografía. La mente del gato doméstico : felis silvestris catuses_ES
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Bienestar Animales_ES
dc.rights.accesRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subject.keywordFelinees_ES
dc.subject.keywordmindes_ES
dc.subject.keywordwelfarees_ES
dc.subject.keywordcognitiones_ES
dc.subject.keywordsentiencees_ES
dc.type.spaTesis y disertaciones (Maestría y/o Doctorado)es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAinsworth. M.D.S. and Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41,49–67.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAznar, J. A. (s.f.). Qué es la mente y cómo surge la consciencia del yo. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Barcelona. http://www.ub.edu/pa1/node/126es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBroom, D. (2014). Sentience and animal welfare. CABI. p. 178.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationByrne, R. W., & Bates, L. A. (2007). Sociality, Evolution and Cognition. Current Biology, 17(16), R714–R723.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChambliss, B. (2018). The mind-body problem. Wires Cognitive Science, 9(4), e1463.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChu, S. C. and Tsai, P. (2007). Computational intelligence based on the behavior of cats. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 3(1),163-173.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCrowell-Davis, S. L., Curtis, T. M., and Knowles, R. J. (2004). Social organization in the cat: A modern understanding. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 6(1),19–28.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCurtis, T. M., Knowles, R. J., and Crowell-Davis, S. L. (2003). Influence of familiarity and relatedness on proximity and allogrooming in domestic cats (Felis catus). American Journal of Veterinary Research, 64(9),1151–1154.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCustance, D., and Mayer, J. (2012). Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: an exploratory study. Animal Cognition, 15(5),851–859.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDawson, L., Cheal, J., Niel, L., and Mason, G. (2019). Humans can identify cats’ affective states from subtle facial expressions. Animal Welfare, 28(4), 519–531.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDawkins, M. S. (2017). Animal welfare with and without consciousness. Journal of Zoology, 301(1),1–10.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDimberg, U., Thunberg, M., and Grunedal, S. (2002). Facial reactions to emotional stimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses. Cognition & Emotion, 16(4),449–471.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDumas, C. (1992). Object permanence in cats (Felis catus)—an ecological approach to the study of invisible displacements. Journal of Comparative Psychology,106(4),404–410.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDurr, R. and Smith, C. (1997). Individual differences and their relation to social structure in domestic cats. Journal of Comparative Psychology,111,412–418.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEdwards, C., Heiblum, M., Tejeda, A., and Galindo, F. (2007). Experimental evaluation of attachment behaviors in owned cats. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 2(4),119–125.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFarm Animal Wefare Committe – FAWC (2014). Evidence and the welfare of farmed animals. Part 1: The evidence base. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/324480/FAWC_report_on_evidence_and_the_welfare_of_farmed_animals_part_1_the_evidence_base.pdfes_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFermo, J. L., Schnaider, M. A., Silva, A. H. P., and Molento, C. F. M. (2019). Only When It Feels Good: Specific Cat Vocalizations Other Than Meowing. Animals, 9(11), 878.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFiset, S., and Dore, F. Y. (2006). Duration of cats’ (Felis catus) working memory for disappearing objects. Animal Cognition,9,62–70.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. The science in its cultural context. UFAW AnimalWelfare Series. Willey-Blackwell.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGalvan, M., and Vonk, J. (2016). Man’s other best friend: domestic cats (F. silvestris catus) and their discrimination of human emotion cues. Animal Cognition, 19(1),193–205.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGarcía García, E. (2008). Neuropsicología y Educación: De las Neuronas Espejo a la Teoría de la Mente. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 1(3),69-89.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGarcía Pinillos, R., Appleby M. C., Manteca, X., Scott-Park, F., Smith, C. And Velarde, A. (2016). One Welfare – a platform for improving human and animal welfare. Veterinary Record, 179, 412-413.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127(1),45–86.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLow, P. (2012). The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. In: Jaak Panksepp, J., Reiss, D., Edelman, D., Van Swinderen, B., Low, P. and Koch, C (Eds.), The Francis Crick Memorial Conference on Consciousness in Human and non-Human Animals. University of Cambridge. http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdfes_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcComb, K., Taylor, A. M., Wilson, C., and Charlton, B. D. (2009). The cry embedded within the purr. Current Biology, 19(13),R507–R508.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcDowell, L. J., Wells, D. L., Hepper, P. G., and Dempster, M. (2016). Lateral bias and temperament in the domestic cat (Felis silvestris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130(4),313–320.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerola, I., Lazzaroni, M., Marshall-Pescini, S., and Prato-Previde, E. (2015). Social referencing and cat–human communication. Animal Cognition, 18(3),639–648.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoody, C. M., Picketts, V. A., Mason, G. J., Dewey, C. E., and Niel, L. (2018). Can you handle it? Validating negative responses to restraint in cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 204, 94–100.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQuaranta, A., Siniscalchi, M., and Vallortigara, G. (2007). Asymmetric tail-wagging responses by dogs to different emotive stimuli. Current Biology, 17(6),R199–R201.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQuaranta, A., d’ Ingeo, S., Amoruso, R., and Siniscalchi, M. (2020). Emotion Recognition in Cats. Animals, 10(7),1107.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRibes Iñesta, E. (2000). Las psicologías y la definición de sus objetos de conocimiento. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 26(3),367 383.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRodan, I. (2010). Understanding Feline Behavior and Application for Appropriate Handling and Management. Topics in Companion Animal Medicine, 25(4),178–188.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRodan, I., Sundahl, E., Carney, H., Gagnon, A.-C., Heath, S., Landsberg, G., Seksel, K., and Yin, S. (2011). AAFP and ISFM Feline-Friendly Handling Guidelines. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 13(5), 364–375.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRollin, B. (2017). Animal Telos and Animal Welfare. In A New Basis for Animal Ethics: Telos and Common Sense. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRolls, E.T. and Scott, T.R. (2003). Central taste anatomy and neurophysiology. In Doty, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of ollfaction and taste (2nd ed, 379–705). Dekkeres_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaito, A., and Shinozuka, K. (2013). Vocal recognition of owners by domestic cats (Felis catus). Animal Cognition, 16,685–690.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSherman, B. L., Gruen, M. E., Meeker, R. B., Milgram, B., DiRivera, C., Thomson, A., Clary, G. And Hudson, L. (2013). The use of a T-maze to measure cognitive–motor function in cats (Felis catus). Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 8(1),32–39.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShettleworth, S., (2010). Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchwartz, S. (2002). Separation anxiety syndrome in cats: 136 cases (1991–2000). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 220(7),1028–1033.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTirapu-Ustárroz, J., Pérez-Sayes, G., Erekatxo-Bilbao, M., y Pelegrín-Valero, C. (2007). ¿Qué es la teoría de la mente? Revista de Neurología, 44(8), 479-489.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTurner, D. (2017). A review of over three decades of research on cat-human and human-cat interactions and relationships. Behavioural Processes, 141,297–304.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTurner, D. C., Feaver, J., Mendl, M., and Bateson, P. (1986). Variation in domestic cat behaviour towards humans: a paternal effect. Animal Behaviour, 34(6),1890–1892.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVitale, K. R. and Udell, M. A. R. (2015). What’s inside your cat’s head? A review of cat (Felis silvestris catus) cognition research past, present and future. Animal Cognition, 18(6),1195–1206.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVitale, K. R., Mehrkam, L. R., and Udell, M. A. R. (2017a). Social interaction, food, scent or toys? A formal assessment of domestic pet and shelter cat (Felis silvestris catus) preferences. Behavioural Processes, 141,322–328.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVitale, K. R. and Udell, M. A. R. (2017b). Stress, security, and scent: The influence of chemical signals on the social lives of domestic cats and implications for applied settings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 187,69–76.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVitale, K. R. (2018). Feline Cognition. In: Vonk J., Shackelford T. (Eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWhitt, E., Douglas, M., Osthaus, B. And Hocking, I. (2009). Domestic cats (Felis catus) do not show causal understanding in a stringpulling task. Animal Cognition, 12,739–743.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYeats, J. (2016). Quality of life and animal behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 181,19-26.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYeon, S. C., Kim, Y. K., Park, Se. J., Lee, S. S., Lee, S. Y., Suh, E. H., Houpt, K. A., Chang H. H., Lee H. C., Yang B. G. And Lee, H. J. (2011) Differences between vocalization evoked by social stimuli in feral cats and house cats. Behavoural Processes, 87(2),183–189.es_ES
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Bienestar Animales_ES
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaes_ES
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicina Veterinariaes_ES
dc.description.notesPresenciales_ES
dc.creator.cedula80421369es_ES
dc.creator.cedula52986519es_ES
dc.creator.cedula1032407648es_ES
dc.publisher.campusBogotá - Circunvalar-
Aparece en las colecciones: Maestría en Bienestar animal

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Tamaño  
2020Autorizaciondeautores.pdf
  Restricted Access
371.39 kBVisualizar/Abrir  Request a copy
2020DavidMontoyaTorres.pdf817.88 kBVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.