1. Universidad Antonio Nariño
  2. Trabajos de grado
  3. Pregrado
  4. Medicina veterinaria
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.advisorCruz Uribe, Jaime Fabian-
dc.creatorAngel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T15:50:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-05T15:50:59Z-
dc.date.created2020-07-10-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693-
dc.description.abstractThe main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mortality and parasitic diseases, likewise to analyze these types of systems in relation to animal welfare, based on the principles of the 5 freedoms.es_ES
dc.description.tableofcontentsEl objetivo principal fue evaluar las ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas tipo “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia, para así poder hacer una comparación entre los diferentes tipos de producción porcina que existe, basándonos en tres parámetros principales, estereotipias, mortalidad de lechones y enfermedades parasitarias, de igual manera lograr analizar estos tipos de sistemas en relación con el bienestar animal, basándonos en los principios de las 5 libertades.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad Antonio Nariñoes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Antonio Nariñoes_ES
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional UANes_ES
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Antonio Nariñoes_ES
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional UANes_ES
dc.subjectBienestar animales_ES
dc.subjectsistemas de producción porcinaes_ES
dc.subjectsistemas intensivos de producción de cerdoses_ES
dc.subjectsistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdoses_ES
dc.subjectbienestar en cerdas gestanteses_ES
dc.subjectbienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactanciaes_ES
dc.subjectprotocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdoses_ES
dc.subjectsistemas tipo outdoores_ES
dc.subjectmortalidad de lechoneses_ES
dc.subjectparasitismo en producciones porcinases_ES
dc.subjectestereotipias en cerdoses_ES
dc.subjectenriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdoses_ES
dc.titleRevisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.es_ES
dc.publisher.programMedicina Veterinariaes_ES
dc.rights.accesRightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.subject.keywordAnimal welfarees_ES
dc.subject.keywordpig production systemses_ES
dc.subject.keywordintensive pig production systemses_ES
dc.subject.keywordorganic pig production systemses_ES
dc.subject.keywordwelfare in pregnant sowses_ES
dc.subject.keywordwelfare in lactating sowses_ES
dc.subject.keywordprotocols for organic systems in pigses_ES
dc.subject.keywordoutdoor type systemses_ES
dc.subject.keywordpiglet mortalityes_ES
dc.subject.keywordparasitism in pig productionses_ES
dc.subject.keywordstereotypies in pigses_ES
dc.subject.keywordenvironmental enrichment in pigses_ES
dc.type.spaTrabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAntunovi , B., Vargovi , L., Cvrkovi , D., Kundih, K., Spaji , R., Sili, V. , Ostovi , M. (2012). Poljoprivreda. Biosigurnosne Mjere u intenzivnome svinjogojstvu, 18(1), 60-64. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaxter, E. M., Andersen, I. L., & Edwards, S. A. (2018). Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Advances in Pig Welfare, 27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBudiño, F. E. L., Vieira, R. F. N., Mello, S. P., & Duarte, K. M. R. (2014). Behavior and performance of sows fed different levels of fiber and reared in individual cages or collective pens. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 86(4), 2109-2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420140301es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBunge Mennerich, V. B. (2003). Züchtungskunde . Intensive Schweinehaltung – Chance oder Risiko?, 75(6), 452-458. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netes_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCaldara, F. R., Rosa, P. S. G., Ferreira, R. A., Reis, N. M. de O., Nääs, I. de A., Paz, I. C., Ferreira, V. M. (2012). Behavior, performance and physiological parameters of pigs reared in deep bedding. Engenharia Agrícola, 32(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162012000100005es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCampiño, G. P., Espinosa, A., & Ocampo, D. (2010, 1 octubre). Comportamiento de Cerdos de Engorde en un Sistema de Cama Profunda Utilizando Racimos Vacíos de Palma de Aceite Elaeis guineensis Jacq. ORINOQUIA, 14(2), 147-159. Recuperado de ScienceDirectes_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCharlotte, G. E., Henricia, G., Büttnera, K., Meyerb, C., & Krieter, J. (2016, 11 abril). Does housing influence maternal behaviour in sows? Elsevier, 1(180), 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirectes_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChoi, Y., Min, Y., Kim, Y., Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Kim, J., & Jung, H. (2020). Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 62(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCódigo Terrestre: OIE - World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Recuperado 5 de mayo de 2020, de https://www.oie.int/es/normas/codigo-terrestrees_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCriterios de bienestar animal - Certificado Welfair. (2019, 15 octubre). Recuperado 20 de junio de 2020, de https://www.animalwelfair.com/certificado-welfair/criterios/es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEdwards, S., & Leeb, C. (2018). Organic pig production systems, welfare and sustainability. Achieving sustainable production of pig meat , 1, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.19103/as.2017.0030.13es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFernandes, H. C., Moreira, R. F., Longui, F. C., Rinaldi, P. C., & Siqueira, W. (2011). Efeito do aquecimento e resfriamento de pisos no desempenho de matrizes e leitões. Rev. Ceres Viçosa, 58(6), 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2011000600004es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGade, P. B. (2002). Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Science, 62(3), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00123-7es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGodyń, D., Nowicki, J., & Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare—A Review. Animals, 9(6), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060383es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGourdine, J. L., De Greef, K. H., & Rydhmer, L. (2010, 19 abril). Breeding for welfare in outdoor pig production: A simulation study. Livestock Science, (132) pag, 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect.es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGrunert, K. G., Sonntag, W. I., Glanz-Chanos, V., & Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat Science, 137, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHorback, K. M., Pierdon, M. K., & Parsons, T. D. (2016). Behavioral preference for different enrichment objects in acommercial sow herd. Elsevier , 184, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.002es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHötzel, M. J., Machado Filho, L. C., & Dalla Costa, O. A. (2005). Behaviour of pre-parturient sows housed in intensive outdoor or indoor systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 40(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2005000200010es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHuerta, R., & Gasa , J. (2012). Instalaciones para porcinos (Red Porcina Iberoamericana P, 1-13). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.ares_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIzquierdo, A. C., Ruiz, C. G., Campos, V. X., Mendoza, M. M., Huerta, R., Mancera, A. V., … Guerra , E. (2016). El bienestar animal en la producción porcina. II (BM Editores). Recuperado de https://www.produccion-animal.com.ares_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKijlstra, A., & Eijck, I. A. J. M. (2006). Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-5214(06)80005-9es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKilBride, A. L., Mendl, M., Statham, P., Held, S., Harris, M., Marchant-Forde, J. N., … Green, L. E. (2014). Risks associated with preweaning mortality in 855 litters on 39 commercial outdoor pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 117(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.004es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKnecht, D., & Jankowska Mąkosa, A. (2020). Endoparasites in Sows and Selected Reproduction Parameters. Acta Veterinaria, 70(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0005es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKobek Thorsen, C., Aagaard Schild, S. L., Rangstrup, L., Bilde, C., & Pedersen, L. J. (2017). The effect of farrowing duration on maternal behavior of hyperprolific sows in organic outdoor production. Livestock Science, 204, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.015es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLange, A., Gentz, M., Hahne, M., Lambertz, C., Gauly, M., Burfeind, O., & Traulsen, I. (2020). Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets. Agriculture, 10(6), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060230es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (2013). A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 71(10), 2815-2825. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815xes_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLindgren, K., Gunnarsson, S., Höglund, J. et al. Nematode parasite eggs in pasture soils and pigs on organic farms in Sweden. Org. Agr. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00273-3es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLühken, E., Nicolaisen, T., Risch, B., Volkmann, N., Schnier, S., Schulz, J., & Kemper, N. (2019). Comparison of Two Free-Farrowing Systems and a Conventional Farrowing Crate System with Special Regard to Air Hygiene. Agriculture, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010012es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLuković, Z., Škorput, D., & Karolyi, D. (2017). Pig welfare at different production systems. Researchgate, 170-175. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netes_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMaganga, G. D., Kombila, L. B., Boundenga, L., Kinga, I. C. M., Obame-Nkoghe, J., Tchoffo, H., … Awah-Ndukum, J. (2019). Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in farmed pigs in Southeast Gabon, Central Africa. Veterinary World, 12(12), 1888-1896. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1888-1896es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationManteca , X. (2012). Bienestar animal (Red Porcina Iberoamericana. p. 97-111). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.ares_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMellor, D. (2017). Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals, 7(12), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080060es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMesarec, N., Povše, M. P., Škorjanc, D., & Skok, J. (2017). Gangs of piglets: Welfare and growth of imprinted and guided weaners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.018es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNazareno, A. C., da Silva, I. J. O., Nunes, M. L., de Castro, A. C., Miranda, K. O., & Trabachini, A. (2012). Caracterização bioclimática de sistemas ao ar livre e confinado para a criação de matrizes suínas gestantes. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 16(3), 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-43662012000300013es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2015). Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010095es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOliveira da Silva, I. J., Pandorfi, H., & De Stefano Piedade, S. M. (2007, 5 diciembre). Influência do sistema de alojamento no comportamento e bem-estar de matrizes suínas em gestação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7), 1319-1329. Recuperado de www.sbz.org.bres_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOliveira, R. F., Soares, R. T. R. N., Molino, J. P., Costa, R. L., Bonaparte, T. P., Silva Júnior, E. T., … Santos, I. P. (2016). Environmental enrichment improves the performance and behavior of piglets in the nursery phase. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 68(2), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8253es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPark, H. S., Min, B., & Oh, S. H. (2017). Research trends in outdoor pig production — A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(9), 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0330 Principles of Organic Agriculture. (2020, 6 marzo). Recuperado 17 de junio de 2020, de https://www.ifoam.bio/principles-organic-agriculture-brochurees_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRuff, G. R., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Campler, M. R., Moeller, S. J., & Johnson, A. K. (2017). Effect of rubber mats on sow behavior and litter performance during lactation. Livestock Science, 204, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.010es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchrey, L., Kemper, N., & Fels, M. (2017). Behaviour and skin injuries of sows kept in a novel group housing system during lactation. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1394308es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScipioni, R., Martelli, G., & Antonella Volpelli, L. (2009). Assessment of welfare in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(sup1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.117es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationŠpinka, M., Illmann, G. , Chaloupková, H., Náměstková, P., & Neuhauserová, K. (2009). Pig vocalizations as a measure of hunger lfare Quality, 3-13. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netes_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTatemoto, P., Bernardino, T., Morrone, B., Queiroz, M., & Zanella, A. J. (2020). Stereotypic Behavior in Sows Is Related to Emotionality Changes in the Offspring. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00079es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTavares de Oliveira , N., Carvalho, P. L., Genova, J. L., Rodrigues Silveira, F. H., Ogawa, L., Cristofori, E. C., … Almeida Santana, A. L. (2019). Effect of endoparasites occurrence in sows from intensive production system. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 28(4), 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019091es_ES
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVan de Weerd, H. A., & Day, J. E. L. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001es_ES
dc.description.degreenameMédico(a) Veterinario(a)es_ES
dc.description.degreelevelPregradoes_ES
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicina Veterinariaes_ES
dc.description.notesPresenciales_ES
dc.publisher.campusBogotá - Circunvalar-
Aparece en las colecciones: Medicina veterinaria

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Tamaño  
2020JennyPaolaAngelGonzalez.pdf1.32 MBVisualizar/Abrir
2020AutorizaciondeAutores.pdf
  Restricted Access		431.82 kBVisualizar/Abrir  Request a copy
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Ver Estadísticas de uso



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons